![]() ![]() In this case, "Friends" was placed at the end of the phrase. That's a rhetorical device in which the second of two parallel phrases is inverted. Today, a speechwriter would very likely had ended that section with "enemies in war, friends in peace."īut the declaration employs a chiasmus. Like their king, it reads, the British were "deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity." (Descent from the same ancestor.)īut, the declaration adds, Americans will treat the British people "as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends." ![]() The declaration includes a message aimed straight at the British people. A chiasmus: "Enemies in War, in Peace Friends" The "facts" were not being "suggested" or "alleged." They were being presented as what Jefferson and the others saw them - the truth. "Submitted" is also an interesting word choice. But prove to whom? To a 'candid world' - that is, to readers who are free from bias or malice, who are fair, impartial, and just." The opening phrase - 'To prove this' - indicates the 'facts' to follow will indeed prove that George III is a tyrant. That last sentence, Lucas wrote in his paper, "is so innocuous one can easily overlook its artistry and importance. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world." "The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. The section is introduced with these lines: submitted to a candid world"Ī large section of the declaration is devoted to a list of grievances against King George III.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |